AI-assisted research grant management

Run grant calls with the rigor of peer review, the speed of AI.

GRANT-FLOW helps research offices screen proposals, route them intelligently, and support committee decisions — without compromising academic integrity.

SOC-ready audit trail Configurable rubrics Advisory AI reviewer
grantflow.ai / committee

Active calls

12

3 closing this week

In AI screening

48

avg 42s / proposal

Awaiting committee

9

2 flagged for discussion

Quantum Error Correction in NISQ Systems

Fast Track
8.7/ 10 triage

AI-Augmented Clinical Trial Recruitment

Full Review
7.4/ 10 triage

Carbon-Negative Concrete at Scale

Revise
5.2/ 10 triage

Built for every role in the call

From the first eligibility check to the signed decision letter.

University Admin

Govern roles, policies, and institution-wide settings.

Research Office

Design calls, rubrics, eligibility, and AI weights.

Researcher

Submit structured proposals with guided checks.

Reviewer

Score with consistent rubrics alongside an AI advisor.

Committee

Deliberate on ranked briefs and record final decisions.

Workflow

From call to decision, end-to-end

A defensible review process where AI accelerates — humans decide.

01

Configure the call

Eligibility, budget cap, deadlines, rubric, AI weight, required documents.

02

Researcher submits

Structured form + document upload with live completeness checks.

03

AI pre-screens

Eligibility, budget risk, ethics flags, alignment, triage score & route.

04

AI advisory review

Acts as a configurable third reviewer on the same rubric.

05

Human reviewers score

Two reviewers using identical rubric and structured comments.

06

Committee decides

Ranked briefs, weighted scores, decision letter, full audit log.

Weighted scoring

Humans lead. AI advises. Disagreement triggers debate.

Every proposal receives a defensible composite score. When human reviewers diverge significantly, the proposal is automatically routed to committee discussion with a full decision brief.

  • Identical rubric for human and AI reviewers
  • Configurable AI weight per call (default 10%)
  • Auto-flagging on inter-reviewer disagreement
  • Full audit trail of every action and override

Final weighted score

Human Reviewer 145%
Human Reviewer 245%
AI Advisory Reviewer10%
Composite = 0.45·H1 + 0.45·H2 + 0.10·AI — weights fully configurable per call.

Ready to modernize your grant review?

Explore the dashboards or jump straight into a proposal submission.